Legal Opinion

Hilty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1932No. 14701PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of the unlawful practice of medicine and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $50 and one day in jail.

The evidence, without conflict, was to the effect that the appellant treated a boy, Fred Tholen, who was afflicted with St. Vitus’ dance, after examination, for misalignment of certain joints of the vertebrae and spine. Appellant was known as a chiropractor; that for the treatment he gave the boy he charged, and was paid, compensation.

Bill of exception No. 1 raises the question of a material variance between the allegations of the information and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robertus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ehrke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Bullock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Kelley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Stout v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API