Legal Opinion

Ruttenberg v. Friedman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 11, 2012No. 1090600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAIN, Justice.1

Pamela Ruttenberg, Harold Rutten-berg’s widow (“Pamela”), and two of the Ruttenbergs’ three children, Warren Rut-tenberg and Jodi Ruttenberg Benck (hereinafter sometimes collective!y referred to as “the objectors”), appeal from a final judgment of the Jefferson Probate Court, granting the petition of Karl B. Friedman and Daniel H. Markstein III (hereinafter referred to individually as “Friedman” and “Markstein” and sometimes collectively as “the coexecutors”), the coexecutors of the estate of Harold Ruttenberg, for final settlement of the estate. Ruttenberg’s third child,…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Hall v. MazzoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  5. First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wehle v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
  2. R & G, LLC v. RCH IV-WB, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Baker v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Wehle v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API