People v. Timothy
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. We affirm the orders of the Appellate Division. Certainly the 22- and 29-month delays from arrest to trial attending the two indictments here in question were unfortunate *868and not to be encouraged. However, we are not able to conclude that such delay, by itself, has worked a denial' of defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights or in any way prejudiced him. Much of the delay during the latter stages was occasioned by defendant’s dissatisfaction with several assigned counsel who had to be replaced, and by counsel’s other engagements (People v. Purdy, 29 N Y 2d 800). During a discussion…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. PanarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- People v. SingletaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People v. Tolkow, New York County Courts1975
- People v. KnightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. FigueroaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.