Legal Opinion

Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Village of Kewaskum

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The sole ground of attack voiced in the plaintiff’s complaint against the validity of the special assessment is that the plaintiff received no benefit therefrom. The plaintiff alleges that it received no benefit because the sewerage-service charges comprising the same were for the period of October 1, 1954, to September 30, 1955, and the new sewage-treatment plant was not put into operation until October 1, 1955.

Sub. (1) of sec. 66.076, Stats., provides that, in addition to other methods whereby a village may finance improvements to a sewage system, including a treatment plant, is that of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Dickson v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. City of Brookfield v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Duncan Development Corp. v. Crestview Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. CED Properties, LLC v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Steinbach v. Green Lake Sanitary DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API