Illinois Printing Co. v. Electric Shovel Coal Corp.
District Court, E.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtLindley, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The Electric .Shovel Coal Corporation contends that the order allowing the claim and all other orders with reference to the same should be vacated, for the reason that the same was the result of fraud and deception upon the court and of mutual mistake of the parties, resulting in a wrongful allowance. Goddard and the United States contend that the order was one finally adjudicating the rights of the parties, and that, the term at which it was entered having expired, the court is without power to vacate the same.
It is obvious that the order was final in one…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
3Cited by5 opinions
- Acme Poultry Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Auguste Parker v. Checker Taxi Company, Inc., a Corporation, and Field Enterprises, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Babbitz v. McCannDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1970
- Raymond v. WickershamCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Goddard v. Electric Shovel Coal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938