Legal Opinion

Hirning v. Toohey

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1926No. File No. 5830PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURCH, C.

This case is before us upon rehearing. The former opinion is reported in 49 S. D. 496, 207 N. W. 462, to which we refer for the facts. In that opinion we construed section 8984, R. C. 1919, as amended by chapter 124 Laws 1919. The case turned on a question not fully argued in the briefs, or the oral argument of counsel-, and a rehearing was granted to- enable counsel to more fully present their views as to 'the effect of section 6344, R. C. 1919, on the provisions of section 8984. It is the contention of appellant that section 6344 makes an exception in the provision of section 8984,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hirning v. TooheySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schramm v. Bank of California, National Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State v. HoxengSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Revier v. School Board of Sioux Falls School District 49-5South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Strain v. Potter CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ruden v. City of PlatteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API