Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 22, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Reversing.

The appellee, Nancy Ashley, intending to take passage upon a train of the appellant, Louisville & Nashville Eailroad Company, from Frankfort to Pleasure-ville, obtained a ticket and proceeded to the train, which was standing in the yard of appellant at Frankfort. She accosted a brakeman, who was standing near the train, and informed him of where she desired to go, when he directed her to take the rear coach of the train. This was a car of the Pullman Company, and when she arrived at the car she informed the porter in charge of the car of her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Central Passenger Railway Co. v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Bronson v. OakesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
  4. Galena & Chicago Union Railroad v. YarwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  5. Louisville & N. R. R. v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beaver Dam Coal Company v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Cole v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. MakeeverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Acme Mills v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API