Legal Opinion
New Hampshire Insurance v. Schofield
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 20, 1979No. 79-062PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The question in this declaratory judgment action is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co., and not the plaintiff company, provided coverage for the accident in which defendant Jacqueline M. Schofield was injured on premises owned by defendants Neil A. Cowan and Ross V. Deachman.
Neil A. Cowan and Ross V. Deachman, d.b.a. Nero Realty, owned a large set of buildings in the town of Rumney. Part of the premises was a large barn, the ground floor of which was converted to a restaurant. On the second floor of the barn were living quarters and above…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commercial Union Assurance Companies v. GollanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Hanover Insurance v. GrondinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Brown v. City of LaconiaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Sun Insurance v. HamanneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc. v. The City of Keene, New HampshireCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Littlefield v. Acadia InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Connolly v. GalvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- A.J. Cameron Sod Farms, Inc. v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.