Legal Opinion

In re Candee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1904PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by the petitioner, Edward D. Oandee, as receiver of the Anglo-American Savings and Loan Association of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 14th day of November, 1903, denying the petitioner’s application for a writ of peremptory mandamus.

Read the full summary

Appeal by the petitioner, Edward D. Oandee, as receiver of the Anglo-American Savings and Loan Association of New York, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 14th day of November, 1903, denying the petitioner’s application for a writ of peremptory mandamus. Edward D. Oandee was appointed permanent receiver of the Anglo-American Savings and Loan Association on the 5th day of . January, 1900. From the time of his said appointment he has, as such receiver, continuously employed Myer Nussbaum as…

1Opinion of the Court

Chase, J.:

Section 4 of chapter 60 of the Laws of 1902 provides as follows : , “ The receiver may employ not to exceed one counsel and may make such payment upon account for legal services during ijhe progress of the receivership as shall he just and proper, but no such payment on account shall be made to any counsel except upon the approval thereof in writing by the Attorney-General, and such payments shall be subject to the order of the court in whole or in part upon the final settlement of the receiver’s accounts to the same extent as the accounts of general assignees are subject to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. LefkowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API