Kelso v. Townsend
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Gonzales.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
In this case, if the charge of the Court and finding of the jury can be considered with reference to what purports to be a statement of the facts in the record, there is manifest error; but if the statement of facts, as contended by appellee it should be, is no part of the record, and should be excluded from it, the charge would stand as an abstract proposition, and there .would be nothing to show what was the evidence before the jury. The statement- of facts, found on record, is signed by the counsel for the appellant only, and the Judge certifies under his seal that he “ signed the fore-<E…
2Cited by18 opinions
- McManus v. WallisTexas Supreme Court · 1880
- Darcy v. John Turner & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1876
- Hess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
- Lacey v. AsheTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- McGlasson v. FiorellaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.