Legal Opinion

Star Ball Retainer Co. v. Klahn

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided April 30, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, District Judge.

The defendant has filed a general demurrer to the bill of complaint in this cause. The demurrer, however, partakes more of the nature of an answer than of a demurrer. It is what is sometimes called a “speaking demurrer.” A demurrer in equity, as at law, admits all the facts which are properly pleaded. The purpose of a demurrer is not to set out facts, but to test the law arising upon the facts stated in the bill. Questions which cannot be-thus raised must be set out affirmatively either by plea or answer. These propositions are so well settled that a citation of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indurated Fibre Industries Co. v. GraceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1892
  2. Stewart v. MastersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Drainage Construction Co. v. Englewood Sewer Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1894
  4. Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
  5. Rowe v. Blodgett & Clapp Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luten v. Kansas City Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API