Legal Opinion

Public Utilities Commission v. Sebring-Alliance Bus Line

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 1929Published

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

This is an error proceeding from the court of common pleas of Mahoning county wherein the-plaintiff in error was plaintiff and the defendant in error was defendant. The relief sought by the Public Utilities Commission is that the defendant bus company may be enjoined from the operation of carrying passengers and property from the village of Sebring, in Mahoning county, to the city of Alliance in Stark county, and vice versa, until it shall have received from the Utilities Commission a certificate declaring that public convenience and necessity require such operation.

The cause Was submitted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coney Island Motor Bus Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Oyster v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Oyster v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Salisbury Transp. Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API