Legal Opinion

Ossinsky v. Nance

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 14, 1960No. B-131PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

118 So.2d 47 (1960)

Louis OSSINSKY, Sr., and Joseph D. Krol, Appellants,

v.

Dayton NANCE, Appellee.

No. B-131.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

January 14, 1960.

Rehearing Denied February 11, 1960.

Ossinsky & Krol, Daytona Beach, for appellants.

Kinsey, Vincent & Pyle, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

2Per curiam

Finding no error in entry of summary judgment in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, the same is hereby affirmed.

On the appellee's cross-assignment of error, directed to the fact that the costs of the proceeding were taxed against appellee who prevailed in the lower court, Section…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Potock v. TurekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Raffel v. MagarianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Jordan v. ReynoldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. National Title Ins. Co. v. Oscar E. Dooly Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Barkett v. Hotsy Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API