Cummings v. Clark
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
The question of law raised goes to “a part of the claim” of the plaintiff, but not “to the whole” of it. In consequence, we now enter no judgment or order. Counsel may be able to put the record in such shape as that final judgment may be entered to await any appellate action either party may desire to take. The question is a very interesting one, and is made interesting because of its difficulty. The difficulty is in reaching any judgment which will not visit upon one party or the other an unrequited loss. In common with many situatidns, our view of the merits of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- DeGanay v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Berry v. Nall & DuxberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Bradley v. McHaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Gesualdi v. PersoneniAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Emery Bird Thayer Dry Goods Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Lohman v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930