Legal Opinion
(PC) Jones v. Shute
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 27, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01384Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARCELL JONES, No. 2:22-cv-1384-DJC-SCR-P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MICHELLE SHUTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The operative pleading is plaintiff’s first amended complaint, which alleges 19 defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth 20 Amendment when they failed to provide timely treatment for a back…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.