Legal Opinion

Cannell v. Riverside Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1985No. Docket 66429PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals as of right and plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on certain issues and a judgment of no cause of action against defendant. This action arose from an accident while plaintiff was driving her car home from a meeting. A pick-up truck collided with her car, causing her injuries that are at least partially incapacitating. Defendant is plaintiff’s no-fault insurance carrier. After the accident, plaintiff petitioned for a hearing before the Bureau of Workers’ Disability Compensation. This dispute was settled for $22,500,* 1 which defendant claims should…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Kalin v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Michigan Educational Employees Mutual Insurance v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Joiner v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Specht v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Borgess Medical Center v. RestoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Conway v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API