Legal Opinion
Madison Bank and Trust v. FIRST NAT. BANK, ETC.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 28, 1982No. 81-267Published
1Opinion of the Court
635 S.W.2d 268 (1982)
MADISON BANK AND TRUST, et al., Appellants,
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF HUNTSVILLE, Arkansas, et al., Appellees.
No. 81-267.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
June 28, 1982.
Rose Law Firm by Vincent Foster, Jr., Little Rock and Howard Cain, Jr., Huntsville, for appellants.
Friday, Eldredge & Clark by Robert K. Walsh, Little Rock, for appellees.
HOLT, Justice.
In October, 1980, following approximately one year of negotiations, the appellants purchased substantially all the outstanding shares of the Bank of Kingston, a state bank, now named Madison Bank and Trust. The buyer under the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Hickman; Dissent · Purtle.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Syntex Laboratories, Inc. v. The Norwich Pharmacal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Empire Gas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Syntex Laboratories, Inc. v. Norwich Pharmacal Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.