Ludlam v. Pennsylvania Realty Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On demurrer of defendants Corson and Mason to amended bill. .
1Opinion of the Court
Leamistg, Y. C.
At the hearing of a demurrer filed to the original bill it was pointed out that this court will not entertain a bill to set aside a sale of real estate which has been made under process issued by a law court unless a deed has been executed and the legal process lias been thus fully executed. The reason for this rule is that a law court possesses a summary jurisdiction of an equitable nature for the purpose of preventing its own judgments and processes from being the means of working injustice, and this jurisdiction of the law court exists until the process has been finally…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Masi v. MesticeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Century Transit v. Public ServiceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935