Buccino v. California Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants following entry of summary judgment for defendants on her claims for reformation of an insurance contract and for breach of that contract. Because defendants did not show that they complied with the statutory requirement that insurers offer uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage equal to bodily injury liability limits to the insured when issuing automobile insurance policies, we reverse and remand.
Summary judgment is appropriate where the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that no genuine issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Kuchenmeister v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Blizzard v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- Pierce v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Savage v. Grange Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999