Hatch v. Stoneman
California Supreme Court
Original application for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent, as governor of the state of California, to sign, approve and authenticate a certain measure adopted by the legislature of this state at its recent session, providing for the submission to the people of certain amendments to sections one, eight, ten and eleven of article xm of the constitution of the state; and also to issue forthwith a proclamation, as provided in said measure, calling a special election to be held on the 6th day of June, 1885, submitting to the people of the state for their approval the said proposed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Memphis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Draper v. NotewareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Ellingham v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Commonwealth v. GriestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- Johnson v. CraftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- In re Senate File 31Nebraska Supreme Court · 1889
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.