Wood v. Ramond
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The appeal was taken frony the judgment, from “ the order allowing the plaintiff to take a nonsuit, and also from the order refusing to allow the defendants to make proof of the facts set up in defendants’ cross-complaint, and from all the orders and errors specified,” etc. The facts are stated in the opinion. '
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Rhodes, J.:
The plaintiff commenced this action under the two hundred and fifty-fourth section of the Practice 0Act, to quiet his title to certain premises. The defendants, after denying most of the material allegations of the complaint, set up *645wliat is claimed as new matter, and upon it demanded affirmative relief. Upon the hearing, the Court, on the defendants’ motion, ordered a judgment of nonsuit. The defendants, thereupon, offered to prove their allegations of new matter. The Court refused them permission to introduce evidence. This is alleged as error, and is the sole…
2Cited by8 opinions
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
- Ordway v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
- Cullen v. SpremoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Guthiel v. GilmerUtah Supreme Court · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.