Norman v. Valley Gin Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
Appellants were plaintiffs below, and ap-pellee was the defendant. We shall refer to them as such.
Plaintiffs sued defendant to recover for the death of their infant son, David Norman, some 2 years and 8 months old. They did not bring their suit under the death; statute, article 4671, but sought to recover as heirs to the estate of their deceased child, under the survival statute, article 5525, R.S.1925, as amended by Acts 1927, c. 239, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art, 5525) for the value of his destroyed earning capacity based upon his life expectancy.
Plaintiffs, for cause of…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Heil Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Waters Ex Rel. Walton v. Del-Ky, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Houston-American Life Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Harper v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.