Legal Opinion

Norman v. Valley Gin Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1936No. 3021PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’QUINN, Justice.

Appellants were plaintiffs below, and ap-pellee was the defendant. We shall refer to them as such.

Plaintiffs sued defendant to recover for the death of their infant son, David Norman, some 2 years and 8 months old. They did not bring their suit under the death; statute, article 4671, but sought to recover as heirs to the estate of their deceased child, under the survival statute, article 5525, R.S.1925, as amended by Acts 1927, c. 239, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art, 5525) for the value of his destroyed earning capacity based upon his life expectancy.

Plaintiffs, for cause of…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Heil Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Waters Ex Rel. Walton v. Del-Ky, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Houston-American Life Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Harper v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API