Legal Opinion

SUCCESSION OF LARD v. Poland

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 2007No. 42,284-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

960 So.2d 1254 (2007)

SUCCESSION OF Leola LARD (nee Peoples), Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

David POLAND d/b/a Landstar, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 42,284-CA.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.

June 20, 2007.

Pamela Blankenship, for Appellant David Poland d/b/a Landstar, Inc.

John C. Blake, Jonesboro, for Appellees Zula Peoples Qualls, Succession of Leola Peoples Lard, and David Poland d/b/a Landstar, Inc.

James E. Beal, Jonesboro, for Intervenors George Lee Loyd (Lard) and Dennis Lamar Loyd (Lard).

Before GASKINS, DREW and MOORE, JJ.

MOORE, J.

Appellant, David Poland d/b/a Landstar, Inc.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craig v. AmbroseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Davis v. BorskeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. Gauguin, Inc. v. AddisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Roy Anderson Corporation v. 225 Baronne Complex, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API