Hill County v. Bryant & Huffman
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
The Legislature, in 1919, passed a law “creating a more efficient road system for Hill county.” Said act provided for the voting of bonds by the county or any political subdivision thereof for the purpose of building permanent roads, and provides that—
if bonds shall be voted the money derived from the sale of the bonds, “after deducting fixed charges shall be expended only in the subdivision or defined district from which it is collected, for the maintenance of the permanent roads after their construction, and Of such other roads and bridges as may be required by the public interest in such…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Foster v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Bland v. OrrTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Greer v. Hunt CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Baldwin v. Travis CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hill v. SterrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Willman v. City of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
- Brammer Wilder v. Limeston CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1999
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1999