Legal Opinion
Pekin Insurance v. Pulte Home Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 4, 2003No. 1-02-1353, 1-02-1395 consPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cahill
We review a declaratory judgment action of some procedural complexity in which an insurer challenged its duty both to defend and indemnify an additional insured under the insurer’s policy. The dispute generated two appeals. In the first, decided February 23, 2000, we affirmed a trial court finding that the insurer’s reservation of rights letter was defective and waived the insurer’s right to contest a duty to defend. Pekin Insurance Co. v. Pulte Home Corp., No. 1 — 99—1128 (2000) (unpublished order under Supreme Court Rule 23) (Pekin I).
The second (and present) appeal asks us to decide the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Travelers Insurance v. Eljer Manufacturing, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Burtell v. First Charter Service Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alwin v. Village of WheelingAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Miller v. Lockport Realty Group, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Long v. ElbornoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- American States Insurance v. CFM Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Farmers Automobile Insurance v. WroblewskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.