Lancaster v. Lancaster
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM MADISON. Appeal from the Chancery Court at Jackson. T. C. Muse, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
On September 2, 1850, Susan E. Connally and E. E. Lancaster, being both then under age, in anticipation of their intermarriage, which^ took, place shortly afterwards, entered into an ante-nuptial contract, by which the land now in question and certain slaves,, the property of the intended wife, Avere settled upon her to her sole and separate use, enjoyment and control during the joint lives of her and Lancaster; and' if the land was rented out, to pay her the proceeds during their joint lives to her sole and separate use from time to time, so that she should not sell, mortgage, charge, or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bool v. MixNew York Supreme Court · 1837
- Sims v. EverhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Roof v. StaffordNew York Supreme Court · 1827
- Willis v. TwamblyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
- Alston v. JonesNew York Court of Chancery · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.