Legal Opinion

Heard v. Commissioners of Charities

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1896Published

Application by William N. Heard against the commissioners of charities of the city of New York for a writ of mandamus. Heard on motion to show cause why a writ should not issue.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

This is an order to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue directing the commissioners of charities in the city of New York to forthwith restore and reinstate the said William N. Heard to the stewardship of the almshouse in the city of New York, on Blackwell’s Island, etc. The plaintiff claims that he was appointed as such steward in July, 1895, after passing a competitive civil service examination, as required by section 9 of article 5 of the constitution. He alleges that he was summarily removed without any cause December 30, to take effect December 31, 1895. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Cline v. . RobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Swift v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. People Ex Rel. Second Avenue Railroad v. Board of Commissioners of the Department of Public ParksNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Gardner v. . Board of Health of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. In re TorneyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API