Legal Opinion
Johnston v. Tampa Sports Authority
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 28, 2006No. 8:05-cv-2191PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHITTEMORE, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider, Vacate, and Dissolve the Preliminary Injunction (Dkt.7) and Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (Dkt.23). Argument on Defendant’s motion was heard on July 13, 2006. After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record before the state court, Defendants’ Motion to Reconsider, Vacate and Dissolve the Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. The mass suspicionless pat-downs implemented by the Tampa Sports Authority (“TSA”) for NFL games at Raymond James Stadium (“Stadium”) constitute unreasonable searches…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnston v. Tampa Sports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Johnston v. Tampa Sports AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007