Legal Opinion

Rosado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 21, 2009No. 4D07-4889PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant, Elias Rosado, filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus. In the petition, he requested the trial court order his appointed trial counsel to submit to him copies of documentation from his previous litigation for the purpose of preparing a petition for post-conviction relief. The petition was denied by the trial court. Rosado claims the trial court abused its discretion. We agree, as Rosado’s court-appointed counsel was obligated to submit to him, free of charge, documentation from his case file prepared at the public’s expense.

An appellate court reviews a trial court’s decision…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Topps v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Potts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Pearce v. SheffeyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. James v. CrewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Parish v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Harvard ex rel. J.H. v. Village of Palm SpringsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  5. Hollis v. MassaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API