Legal Opinion

State v. David

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 2, 1976No. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Counsel have stipulated:

"It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
"IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

Reversed and remanded.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DavidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977