Legal Opinion

Martin v. Cahill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 6, 1988No. 86-96; CA A42566PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiffs, purchasers of residential property, brought this action against the vendor, Cahill, and the realtors, Carlin, Sweet and Century 21, Coos Realty, Inc. (realtors), alleging a violation of the Unfair Trade Practices Act (UTPA), ORS 646.607(1)(e), 1 and three claims of misrepresentation. The complaint sought actual and punitive damages under UTPA, ORS 646.638(1), damages against all defendants for negligent misrepresentation of the boundaries of the property and rescission for negligent and intentional misrepresentation. Cahill filed a cross-claim against the other defendants, seeking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Redden v. Discount Fabrics, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Construction Consulting AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Oregon Laborers-Employers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1998
  2. Moore Excavating, Inc. v. Consolidated Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Fowler v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. Wiggins v. Peachtree Settlement Funding (In Re Wiggins)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
  5. ARCH CHEMICALS, INC. v. Radiator Specialty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API