Legal Opinion

James R. Barnacle & Co. v. Henderson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1894No. 5547PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appear from the district court of Douglas county. Heard below before Doane, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

On the 29th day of April, 1890, one J. H. Yan Closter was the owner of lot 27, Rees Place Addition to the city of Omaha. While he was the owner of this property he entered into contracts with various persons by which they were to furnish labor or material for the erection of some buildings on said lot. After the improvements had been commenced Yan Closter sold and conveyed the property to one Hallett H. Henderson. The material-men and laborers not having been paid in full, one of them, James R. Barnacle & Co., brought this suit against Henderson, Yan Closter, and a large number of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hoagland v. Lusk Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Young v. HibbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Zarrs v. KeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Central Construction Co. v. KeeferNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API