Legal Opinion

In re Riverhead, Quogue & Southampton Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application by The Riverhead, Quogue and Southampton Railroad .Company for the certificate required by section 59 of the Railroad Law, the Board of Railroad Commissioners having refused the application made to it for such certificate.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

This application was made by the railroad company for a certificate as required by section 59 of the Railroad Law (Chap. 565 of the Laws of 1890, as amended by chap. 676 of the Laws of 1892, as amended' by chap. 545 of the Laws of 1895). The Commissioners denied the application upon two grounds: First, “ That the application is as to the second articles of association, which the' Board does not believe were lawfully amended; ” and, second, «That the route cannot be changed at this time under the provisions of section thirteen of the Railroad Law.” The Board *515■declined to pass upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farnham v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. In re Kings, Queens & Suffolk RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. In re Citizens' Water Works Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Long Island Railroad v. Board of Railroad CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. In re Creditor's Audit & Adjustment Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API