Legal Opinion

Cool v. Hubbard

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 23, 1972No. 43263PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William D. Gunn, Justice. *

Defendants, Stanley S. Hubbard and Karen E. Hubbard, ap peal from a judgment entered following trial of an action by plaintiffs, Richard F. Cool and Helen M. Cool, for specific performance of a contract or damages and a counterclaim for reformation of the same contract. The trial court granted plaintiffs’ request for specific performance but allowed them no damages and denied defendants’ request for reformation.

The primary questions in this case are whether a mutual mistake or a unilateral mistake occurred- in the formation of the sales agreement in which defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Balafas v. AngelosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Farmers' Store of Wheaton, Inc. v. Delaware Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Abramson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Donaldson v. KohnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Theisen’s Inc. v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  2. Theros v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Crowley Co. v. Metropolitan Airports CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Metropolitan Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Wakefield v. Anchor Bancorp, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API