Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 19, 1980No. 79-142PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal arises from the trial court's decree granting appellee's motion for summary judgment and denying the relief sought in appellant's complaint for redemption of certain property following a foreclosure sale.

In 1975, appellant, Patricia Yost Purcell, and her husband purchased a lot and house, giving a mortgage for a portion of the purchase price. Thereafter, appellant and her husband were divorced. As a part of the divorce settlement, the parties agreed that appellant would forego possession of the property in return for her ex-husband's assuming responsibility for the mortgage,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. KinnairdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Hudson v. MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Foerster v. SwiftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Garvich v. Associates Financial Services Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Watts v. Rudulph Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Skelton v. J&G, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. First Colbert National Bank v. Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  5. Steven Chess v. Wade Burt.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API