Legal Opinion

Clifford Howard v. Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 17, 1993No. 305, Docket 92-2289PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents an issue concerning the application of the Batson rule barring' discriminatory use of peremptory challenges. See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). The precise issue is whether in the infrequent case where a court finds that race was a factor in a prosecutor’s exercise of peremptory challenges, the dual motivation principle applies such that the prosecutor bears the burden of proof to persuade the trier that the challenges would have been exercised for race-neutral reasons even if race had not been a factor.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Gierlinger v. GleasonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. Farm Labor Organizing Committee v. Ohio State Highway PatrolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  5. People v. MunsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API