Montague v. Garnett
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 81 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL EROJI OWEN CIRGÜIT COURT. CITED — - Revised Statutes, chap. 22, 1 Stanton, 264. 3 Mon., 252; Roberts vs. Tennell. 4 B. Mon., 415; Holloway vs. Hampton. 6 B. Mon., 17; Sanders vs. Kastenbine’s cx’r. 9 B. Mon., 428; Davenport vs. Gentry’s adm’r. Chitty on Contracts, ed’n 1848,^. 67. 15 B. Mon., 446, and cases cited. Civil Code, section 123. 13 B. Mon., 466; Fible vs. Caplinger. MSS. Opin., Goddard vs. Maddox.
Read the full summary
CASE 81 — PETITION ORDINARY — APPEAL EROJI OWEN CIRGÜIT COURT. CITED — - Revised Statutes, chap. 22, 1 Stanton, 264. 3 Mon., 252; Roberts vs. Tennell. 4 B. Mon., 415; Holloway vs. Hampton. 6 B. Mon., 17; Sanders vs. Kastenbine’s cx’r. 9 B. Mon., 428; Davenport vs. Gentry’s adm’r. Chitty on Contracts, ed’n 1848,^. 67. 15 B. Mon., 446, and cases cited. Civil Code, section 123. 13 B. Mon., 466; Fible vs. Caplinger. MSS. Opin., Goddard vs. Maddox. CITED— 3 Mon., 247; Roberts vs. Tcnnell.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered tiie opinion of ti-ie court:
Garnett leased Montague his farm for three years from January 1, 1861, until January 1, 1864, and, at the same time, verbally loaned him one hundred barrels of corn and three thousand three hundred and sixty pounds of pork, to be returned at the expiration of the lease. The corn and pork not being returned, Garnett sued, and recovered judgment for their value, from which Montague appealed.
It is insisted that this was a verbal contract, not to be performed within a year, and, therefore, no recovery can be had because of the statute against…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Hummel v. HummelOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Boone v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Hinton v. Hinton'sCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Waters v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Sears v. OhlerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.