Legal Opinion

Houg v. Houg

New York Family Court

Decided June 10, 1936PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaneen, J.

Both parties present. It sometimes becomes necessary for the court to chart and blaze a new path. As a cold legal proposition, probably the court should make an order in this case *895requiring the respondent to contribute to the support and maintenance of the petitioner. The law, however, must in its application reflect a high sense of justice and a response to that which conscience dictates. While it is true that as between the spouse who is chargeable with the duty of providing for a dependent and the community, the obligation rests first on the spouse. Public policy would be shocked beyond…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bickford v. BickfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Campas v. CampasNew York Family Court · 1969
  3. Mendelsohn v. MendelsohnNew York Family Court · 1948
  4. In re KittellColumbia County Court · 1939
  5. In re the Accounting of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API