Houg v. Houg
New York Family Court
1Opinion of the CourtRaneen, J.
Both parties present. It sometimes becomes necessary for the court to chart and blaze a new path. As a cold legal proposition, probably the court should make an order in this case *895requiring the respondent to contribute to the support and maintenance of the petitioner. The law, however, must in its application reflect a high sense of justice and a response to that which conscience dictates. While it is true that as between the spouse who is chargeable with the duty of providing for a dependent and the community, the obligation rests first on the spouse. Public policy would be shocked beyond…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bickford v. BickfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Campas v. CampasNew York Family Court · 1969
- Mendelsohn v. MendelsohnNew York Family Court · 1948
- In re KittellColumbia County Court · 1939
- In re the Accounting of JacksonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.