Legal Opinion
State v. Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 9, 2005No. 31299-9-IIPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
117 P.3d 377 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Luis Gustavo HOPKINS, Appellant.
No. 31299-9-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Two.
August 9, 2005.
Stephanie C. Cunningham, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Kathleen Proctor, Pierce County Prosecuting Atty. Ofc., Tacoma, WA, for Respondent.
VAN DEREN, J.
¶ 1 Luis G. Hopkins challenges the trial court's denial of his suppression motion, arguing that an unreliable informant's tip did not justify the officers' investigatory stop. Holding that the officers did not have a reasonable suspicion to seize Hopkins, we reverse the trial court's denial…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. Z.U.E.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- People v. DollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Z.U.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.