Legal Opinion

Movsovitz v. Wills

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1955No. 35700Published

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

The defendant objected to the trial court allowing the plaintiff to amend the petition on the ground that there was not enough in the petition as originally filed to amend by. Code § 81-1302 provides: “A petition showing a plaintiff and a defendant, and setting out sufficient to indicate and specify some particular fact or transaction as a cause of action, shall be *197enough to amend by. . . If the declaration shall omit to allege facts essential to raise the duty or obligation involved in the cause of action which was evidently originally intended to be declared upon, the omitted fact may be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. He-Po Gas Incorporated v. RoathCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Cannon v. Hood Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Ivey v. SymmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  4. Swinford v. Burdett Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API