Legal Opinion

People v. Lurz

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 2008No. 2-06-0503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BYRNE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Following a jury trial, defendant, Wayde J. Lurz, appeals his conviction of driving while under the influence of alcohol (DUI) (625 ILCS 5/11 — 501(a)(2) (West 2006)). On appeal, he raises three issues: (1) lack of probable cause to arrest; (2) insufficient evidence of driving while under the influence; and (3) erroneous jury instructions. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

I. Hearing on the Motion to Quash Arrest and Suppress Evidence

At the hearing on the motion to quash arrest and suppress evidence, defendant testified…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Highland Park v. KaneAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  2. People v. UnderwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  3. People v. DayAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  4. People v. DayAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  5. People v. HillisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API