Legal Opinion

Rice v. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1925No. 6 Div. 263PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

While, as a general rule, the commissions allowed to executors and administrators, within or less than the maximum fixed by statute (Code, 1923, §§ 5923, 5924), is largely discretionary with the trial court (Collins v. Clements, 199 Ala. 618, 75 So. 165), this rule has exceptions, one of which is that if the estate is so large, and the administration of same does not require extraordinary service and trouble, the allowance by the trial court would afford more than fair compensation as contemplated by law, it is not only within the authority but is the duty of this court to correct or reduce…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kenan v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  2. Collins v. ClementsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Noble v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. McCollum v. TownsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. Mann v. RudderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API