Legal Opinion

Rososky v. Galligan

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided February 28, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLoConto, J.

The plaintiff seeks review of the trial judge’s allowance of the defendants’ motion to dismiss. We find no prejudicial error and dismiss the report. The facts necessary to decide the issues are as follows.

The plaintiff, Pamela J. Rososky, brought an action for personal injuries she claimed were received as a result of a Massachusetts motor vehicle accident. On February 18, 1994, she filed a motion for entry of a default judgment and assessment of damages. The defendants were notified of said hearing by regular mail. Paul C. Galligan, Jr., alleged to be the operator of the motor vehicle, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saint Louis v. Balloons Over BostonMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API