Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fiallos v. New York University Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 2011Published

1DissentSweeny, J.

I would affirm the granting of the motion to change venue.

*679The burden is on the defendant, as the movant, to establish that plaintiff improperly designated Bronx County as the venue for this action (see Garced v Clinton Arms Assoc., 58 AD3d 506, 509 [2009]). This burden may, under appropriate circumstances, be satisfied by submitting counsel’s sworn averment explaining why there are insufficient grounds for venue as laid (see Torres v Larsen, 195 AD2d 285, 286-287 [1993]). Although Torres concerned a CPLR 510 (3) motion to change venue due to the inconvenience of witnesses, its reasoning…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Torres v. LarsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Garced v. Clinton Arms AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Castro v. New York Hospital Medical Center of QueensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Goldberg v. BiermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API