Legal Opinion

Sultan v. Coinbase, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 24, 2019No. Case No. 18-934 (FB) (ST)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREDERIC BLOCK, Senior United States District Judge

In this diversity action, Ezra C. Sultan alleges that Coinbase, Inc., an online exchange for digital currencies like Bitcoin, negligently failed to prevent a scam that allowed a third party to steal more than $200,000 from his account. Coinbase moves to compel arbitration pursuant to a mandatory arbitration clause in its user agreement. For the following reasons, the motion is granted.

I

"In deciding motions to compel, courts apply a 'standard similar to that applicable for a motion for summary judgment.' " Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc. , 834…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. AKF, Inc. v. Kessman Group Painting & Design, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  2. Engen v. Grocery Delivery E-Services USA Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
  3. Hidalgo v. Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Picha v. Gemini Trust Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API