Legal Opinion

United States v. Eggleston

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1877PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Action on paymaster's bond [by the United States against Virgil S. Eggleston and others].

1Opinion of the Court

DEADY, District Judge.

0⅛ July 10, 1873, the defendant Eggleston, being a paymaster in the army of the United States, gave a bond to the plaintiff, with the defendant Robie and the deceased Alexander Miller as his sureties therein, in the sum of $40,000, conditioned, among other things, that said Eggleston would account for all moneys received by him as such paymaster, and, when thereunto, required, would refund any such moneys remaining in his hands unaccounted for.

On December 15, 1875, upon a statement and adjustment of Eggleston’s accounts at the treasury department, it was. ascertained and…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FunkIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson Shipyards CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
  3. In re Wyley Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1923
  4. In re the Final Accounting of StilesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  5. Jewell v. NuhnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API