Legal Opinion

Claim of Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1954PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtImrie, J.

On April 30, 1953, the Workmen’s Compensation Board made a decision modifying prior awards to read “ for 75 weeks from 3/10/50 to 8/17/51 @ $32 per week totaling $2400 ” and concluding with the statement, “ since claimant refuses to accept compensation, the case is closed, pending the outcome of the action which the claimant has instituted.” It reversed a referee’s decision reading, “ Closed — claimant refuses to accept jurisdiction of New York State under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.” In its memorandum of decision the board found that, on the basis of the evidence then before it, at the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brassel v. Electric Welding Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Doca v. Federal Stevedoring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Claim of Leatham v. Thurston & BraidichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  5. Meaney v. KeatingNew York Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Claim of Pierce v. KellertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Claim of Carrasquilla v. Penn Akron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Johnson v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  4. Montross v. Walgreen Co. of New York, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  5. United Environmental Workers v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API