Legal Opinion

Strickland v. American National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 16, 1925No. 16396Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. A petition for certiorari from a judgment of a justice’s court is not subject to a motion to dismiss on the ground that the assignment of error is too vague and indefinite, where the petition, in addition to a general assignment of error on the final judgment against the petitioner, contains a proper special assignment of error on the *550refusal to admit in evidence an original draft and bill of lading which •formed the basis of the petitioner’s claim.

Decided November 16, 1925. Francis B. Hunter, for plaintiff. Fred. T. Lanier, for defendant.

2. “Where a consignor of goods delivers them to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bank v. EverettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  2. American National Bank v. LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Alexander, Smith & Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  4. Levy v. McPhailCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API