Legal Opinion
Caswell v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided October 30, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 13723PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
This memorandum deals with the last unresolved issue growing out of a damage suit by Clarence J. Caswell, a longshoreman, against Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N. V., the shipowner, who in turn impleaded Strachan Shipping Company, the stevedore. For a statement of the facts and the decision of the court on other issues in this case see D.C., 205 F.Supp. 295. In that memorandum the court answered in the affirm*103ative the question, “Is the third party plaintiff entitled to recover expenses and attorney’s fees over against a third party defendant where…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- General Electric Company v. Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1960
- Caswell v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N. V.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- George Lusich v. Bloomfield Steamship Company, Bloomfield Steamship Company v. Boland MacHine and Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Strachan Shipping Company v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Skibs A/s HasselCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Smith v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1965