Legal Opinion

Broughton Lumber Co. v. Yeutter

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 12, 1991No. 90-1151PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Chief Judge.

Broughton Lumber Company appeals from the order of the district court, Broughton Lumber Co. v. Yeutter, Civ. No. 89-824-MA (D.Ore. August 1, 1989) (Marsh, J.), transferring its action to the United States Claims Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (1988). Broughton seeks to litigate a multi-million dollar claim for the taking of its property in the Oregon district court asserting jurisdiction has been provided by° reason of the Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Act, Pub.L. No. 99-663, 100 Stat. 4274 (1986) (codified at 16 U.S.C. §§ 544-544p (1988)) (Gorge Act), which…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., Inc. v. Lloyd Bentsen, Secretary of the Treasury, and at & T Federal Systems, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. The Sharman Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Grice v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  4. West Jefferson Levee D. v. Coast QualitySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Clouser v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API